A.B. 413
Assembly Bill No. 413–Assemblymen Knecht, Hettrick, Brown, Beers, Angle, Andonov, Carpenter, Christensen, Claborn, Gibbons, Goicoechea, Grady, Griffin, Gustavson, Hardy, Mabey, Marvel, Parks, Sherer and Weber
March 17, 2003
____________
Referred to Committee on Government Affairs
SUMMARY—Makes various changes relating to state financial administration. (BDR 31‑819)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
Effect on the State: Yes.
~
EXPLANATION
– Matter in bolded italics is new; matter
between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Green numbers along left margin indicate location on the printed bill (e.g., 5-15 indicates page 5, line 15).
AN ACT relating to state financial administration; requiring the Governor to submit with the budget his proposed recommendations for reductions, if required, in the budget; requiring that adopted regulations include a statement of the net benefit to the State from the adoption of the regulation; requiring the Interim Finance Committee to study the process of preparing and analyzing the budget to ensure effective fiscal management of the State; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1-1 Section 1. NRS 353.230 is hereby amended to read as follows:
1-2 353.230 1. The Chief shall review the estimates, altering,
1-3 revising, increasing or decreasing the items of the estimates as he
1-4 may deem necessary in view of the needs of the various
1-5 departments, institutions and agencies in the Executive Department
1-6 of the State Government and the total anticipated income of the
1-7 State Government and of the various departments, institutions and
1-8 agencies of the Executive Department during the next fiscal year. In
2-1 performing the duties required by this subsection, the Chief shall use
2-2 the projections and estimates prepared by the Economic Forum
2-3 pursuant to NRS 353.228.
2-4 2. The Chief shall meet with a fiscal analyst of the Legislative
2-5 Counsel Bureau , or his designated representative , and personnel of
2-6 the various departments, institutions and agencies of the Executive
2-7 Department to discuss:
2-8 (a) The budgetary requests of each department, institution and
2-9 agency; and
2-10 (b) The budgetary recommendations of the Budget Division of
2-11 the Department of Administration for each department, institution
2-12 and agency,
2-13 for the next 2 fiscal years. The Chief shall allow the fiscal analyst of
2-14 the Legislative Counsel Bureau , or his designated representative ,
2-15 full access to all materials connected with the review.
2-16 3. The Chief shall then prepare a final version of the proposed
2-17 budget, in accordance with NRS 353.150 to 353.246, inclusive, and
2-18 shall deliver it to the Governor. The final version of the proposed
2-19 budget must include the adjusted base budget for each department,
2-20 institution and agency of the Executive Department, the costs for
2-21 continuing each program at the current level of service and the
2-22 costs, if any, for any new programs[,] or for recommended
2-23 enhancements of existing programs or reductions for the
2-24 departments, institutions and agencies of the Executive Department
2-25 for the next 2 fiscal years. All projections of revenue and any other
2-26 information concerning future state revenue contained in the
2-27 proposed budget must be based upon the projections and estimates
2-28 prepared by the Economic Forum pursuant to NRS 353.228.
2-29 4. The Governor shall, not later than 14 calendar days before
2-30 the commencement of the regular legislative session, submit the
2-31 proposed budget to the Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau
2-32 for transmittal to the Legislature. The Governor shall simultaneously
2-33 submit, as [a separate document:] separate documents:
2-34 (a) An analysis of any new programs or enhancements of
2-35 existing programs being recommended[; and
2-36 (b) Any] and any increase in or new revenues which are being
2-37 recommended in the proposed budget.The document must specify
2-38 the total cost by department, institution or agency of new programs
2-39 or enhancements, but need not itemize the specific costs. All
2-40 projections of revenue and any other information concerning future
2-41 state revenue contained in the document must be based upon the
2-42 projections and estimates prepared by the Economic Forum pursuant
2-43 to NRS 353.228.
2-44 (b) The Governor’s recommendations for accomplishing a
2-45 reduction of 3 percent of the total amount appropriated and 10
3-1 percent of the total amount appropriated in each fiscal year from
3-2 the State General Fund, if such reductions are deemed necessary
3-3 by the Legislature.
3-4 5. On or before the 19th calendar day of the regular legislative
3-5 session, the Governor shall submit to the Legislative Counsel
3-6 recommendations for each legislative measure which will be
3-7 necessary to carry out the final version of the proposed budget or to
3-8 carry out the Governor’s legislative agenda. These
3-9 recommendations must contain sufficient detailed information to
3-10 enable the Legislative Counsel to prepare the necessary legislative
3-11 measures.
3-12 6. During the consideration of the general appropriation bill
3-13 and any special appropriation bills and bills authorizing budgeted
3-14 expenditures by the departments, institutions and agencies operating
3-15 on money designated for specific purposes by the Nevada
3-16 Constitution or otherwise, drafted at the request of the Legislature
3-17 upon the recommendations submitted by the Governor with the
3-18 proposed budget, the Governor or his representative have the right
3-19 to appear before and be heard by the appropriation committees of
3-20 the Legislature in connection with the appropriation bill or bills, and
3-21 to render any testimony, explanation or assistance required of him.
3-22 Sec. 2. NRS 233B.066 is hereby amended to read as follows:
3-23 233B.066 1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2,
3-24 each adopted regulation which is submitted to the Legislative
3-25 Counsel Bureau pursuant to NRS 233B.067 or filed with the
3-26 Secretary of State pursuant to subsection 2 of NRS 233B.070 must
3-27 be accompanied by a statement concerning the regulation which
3-28 contains the following information:
3-29 (a) A description of how public comment was solicited, a
3-30 summary of the public response[,] and an explanation of how other
3-31 interested persons may obtain a copy of the summary.
3-32 (b) The number of persons who:
3-33 (1) Attended each hearing;
3-34 (2) Testified at each hearing; and
3-35 (3) Submitted to the agency written statements.
3-36 (c) A description of how comment was solicited from affected
3-37 businesses, a summary of their response[,] and an explanation of
3-38 how other interested persons may obtain a copy of the summary.
3-39 (d) If the regulation was adopted without changing any part of
3-40 the proposed regulation, a summary of the reasons for adopting the
3-41 regulation without change.
3-42 (e) The estimated economic effect of the regulation on the
3-43 business which it is to regulate and on the public. These must be
3-44 stated separately[,] and in each case must include:
3-45 (1) Both adverse and beneficial effects; and
4-1 (2) Both immediate and long-term effects.
4-2 (f) The estimated cost to the agency for enforcement of the
4-3 proposed regulation.
4-4 (g) An analysis of the social and economic benefit of the
4-5 regulation as compared to the cost and negative impact of the
4-6 regulation, and a determination of whether such an analysis
4-7 demonstrates that there is a net benefit to the people and economy
4-8 of the State from the adoption of the regulation. If the agency
4-9 determines that there is a net benefit to the people and economy of
4-10 the State, the analysis must include findings of fact and
4-11 conclusions of law showing that the benefit to the people and
4-12 economy of the State exceeds the cost to and negative impact upon
4-13 the people and economy of the State, and a statement of whether
4-14 the approach taken in the adopted regulation is the most cost-
4-15 effective way of accomplishing the desired regulatory goal. If the
4-16 agency determines that there is not a net benefit to the people and
4-17 economy of the State, the analysis must indicate the reason that
4-18 there is not a net benefit and the rationale for adopting the
4-19 regulation notwithstanding the lack of a net benefit.
4-20 (h) A description of any regulations of other state or government
4-21 agencies which the proposed regulation overlaps or duplicates and a
4-22 statement explaining why the duplication or overlapping is
4-23 necessary. If the regulation overlaps or duplicates a federal
4-24 regulation, the explanation must include the name of the regulating
4-25 federal agency.
4-26 [(h)] (i) If the regulation includes provisions which are more
4-27 stringent than a federal regulation which regulates the same activity,
4-28 a summary of such provisions.
4-29 [(i)] (j) If the regulation provides a new fee or increases an
4-30 existing fee, the total annual amount the agency expects to collect
4-31 and the manner in which the money will be used.
4-32 2. The requirements of paragraphs (a) to (d), inclusive, of
4-33 subsection 1 do not apply to emergency regulations.
4-34 Sec. 3. NRS 233B.067 is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-35 233B.067 1. After adopting a permanent regulation, the
4-36 agency shall submit the informational statement prepared pursuant
4-37 to NRS 233B.066 and one copy of each regulation adopted to the
4-38 Legislative Counsel for review by the Legislative Commission,
4-39 which may refer it to a joint interim committee, to determine
4-40 whether the regulation conforms to the statutory authority pursuant
4-41 towhich it was adopted and whether the regulation carries out the
4-42 intent of the Legislature in granting that authority. If the
4-43 informational statement prepared pursuant to NRS 233B.066
4-44 includes a determination pursuant to paragraph (g) of subsection
4-45 1 of that section that there is not a net benefit to the people and
5-1 economy of the State from the adoption of the regulation, the
5-2 Legislative Counsel shall specifically notify the Legislative
5-3 Commission of that determination. The Legislative Counsel shall
5-4 endorse on the original and the copy of each adopted regulation the
5-5 date of their receipt. The Legislative Counsel shall maintain the
5-6 copy of the regulation in a file and make the copy available for
5-7 public inspection for 2 years.
5-8 2. If an agency submits an adopted regulation to the Legislative
5-9 Counsel pursuant to subsection 1 that:
5-10 (a) The agency is required to adopt pursuant to a federal statute
5-11 or regulation; and
5-12 (b) Exceeds the specific statutory authority of the agency or sets
5-13 forth requirements that are more stringent than a statute of this
5-14 state,
5-15 [it] the agency shall include a statement that adoption of the
5-16 regulation is required by a federal statute or regulation. The
5-17 statement must include the specific citation of the federal statute or
5-18 regulation requiring such adoption.
5-19 3. The Legislative Commission, or the joint interim committee
5-20 if the Commission has referred it to such a committee, shall review
5-21 the regulation at its next regularly scheduled meeting if the
5-22 regulation is received more than 10 working days before the
5-23 meeting and a regular meeting is held within 35 days after receipt of
5-24 the regulation. The Commission may appoint a committee
5-25 composed of three or more members of the Commission or any joint
5-26 interim committee to examine proposed regulations received more
5-27 than 35 days before a regular meeting is scheduled to be held.
5-28 4. The Legislative Commission shall notify the Legislative
5-29 Counsel of the results of its review within 30 days after receipt of
5-30 the regulation from the agency. If the Commission does not object
5-31 to the regulation, the Legislative Counsel shall file it with the
5-32 Secretary of State within 35 days after receipt from the agency and
5-33 notify the agency of the filing. If the Commission objects to the
5-34 regulation after determining that:
5-35 (a) If subsection 2 is applicable, the regulation is not required
5-36 pursuant to a federal statute or regulation;
5-37 (b) The regulation does not conform to statutory authority; or
5-38 (c) The regulation does not carry out legislative intent,
5-39 the Legislative Counsel shall attach to the regulation a written notice
5-40 of the objection of the Commission, including a statement of the
5-41 reasons for its objection, and shall promptly return the regulation to
5-42 the agency.
5-43 Sec. 4. 1. The Interim Finance Committee shall review the
5-44 executive budget and the process of preparing and analyzing the
5-45 budget to determine ways to improve the ability of the Legislature,
6-1 through the budget process, to ensure effective fiscal management
6-2 of the State. The review must include, without limitation, an
6-3 analysis of:
6-4 (a) The historic information compiled and maintained with
6-5 respect to the budget;
6-6 (b) The performance indicators used by state agencies;
6-7 (c) The manner in which caseload increases and other
6-8 adjustments to the budget are determined;
6-9 (d) Projections or other statistical information that would be
6-10 helpful to the Legislature in reviewing the budget; and
6-11 (e) The adequacy of the information being collected and
6-12 transmitted to the Legislature,
6-13 and of how improvements in these areas can assist the Legislature in
6-14 ensuring effective fiscal management of the State.
6-15 2. The Interim Finance Committee shall submit a report with
6-16 its recommendations for improving the budget process to ensure
6-17 effective fiscal management of the State to the 73rd Session of the
6-18 Legislature.
6-19 Sec. 5. This act becomes effective on July 1, 2003.
6-20 H