(REPRINTED WITH ADOPTED AMENDMENTS)
FIRST REPRINT


Senate Bill No. 282-Committee on Judiciary

April 8, 1997
____________

Referred to Committee on Judiciary

SUMMARY--Revises provisions governing grounds for granting trial de novo after arbitration. (BDR 3-1509)

FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
Effect on the State or on Industrial Insurance: No.

EXPLANATION - Matter in italics is new; matter in brackets [ ] is material to be omitted.

AN ACT relating to arbitration; revising the provisions governing the grounds for granting a trial de novo after arbitration; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1 NRS 38.255 is hereby amended to read as follows:
38.2551. The rules adopted by the supreme court pursuant to NRS 38.253 to provide guidelines for the establishment by a district court of a program must include provisions for a:
(a) Mandatory program for the arbitration of civil actions pursuant to NRS 38.250.
(b) Voluntary program for the arbitration of civil actions if the cause of action arises in the State of Nevada and the amount in issue exceeds $40,000.
(c) Voluntary program for the use of binding arbitration in all civil actions.
2. The rules must provide that the district court of any judicial district whose population is 100,000 or more:
(a) Shall establish programs pursuant to paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of subsection 1.
(b) May set fees and charge parties for arbitration if the amount in issue exceeds $40,000.
The rules may provide for similar programs for the other judicial districts.
3. The rules must exclude the following from any program of mandatory arbitration:
(a) Actions in which the amount in issue, excluding attorney's fees, interest and court costs, is more than $40,000 or less than the maximum jurisdictional amounts specified in NRS 4.370 and 73.010;
(b) Class actions;
(c) Actions in equity;
(d) Actions concerning the title to real estate;
(e) Probate actions;
(f) Appeals from courts of limited jurisdiction;
(g) Actions for declaratory relief;
(h) Actions involving divorce or problems of domestic relations;
(i) Actions brought for relief based on any extraordinary writs;
(j) Actions for the judicial review of an administrative decision; and
(k) Actions in which the parties, pursuant to a written agreement executed before the accrual of the cause of action, have submitted the controversy to arbitration or any other alternative method for resolving a dispute.
4. The rules must include:
(a) Guidelines for the award of attorney's fees and maximum limitations on the costs to the parties of the arbitration;
(b) Disincentives to appeal; and
(c) Provisions for trial upon the exercise by either party of his right to a trial anew after the arbitration.
5. The rules must provide that the district court, after conducting a hearing, shall grant a request for a trial anew after the arbitration if the award is:
(a) In violation of a constitutional or statutory provision;
(b) In excess of the statutory authority of the arbitrator;
(c) Made upon unlawful procedure;
(d) Affected by any other error of law;
(e) Erroneous in view of the reliable and probative evidence on the whole record; or
(f) Arbitrary, capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion.
In determining whether to grant a trial anew, the district court may substitute its judgment for that of the arbitrator.
6. The supreme court shall, on or before February 1 of each odd-numbered year, submit a report to the director of the legislative counsel bureau for transmittal to the chairmen of the assembly and senate standing committees on the judiciary. The report must include, for the period since the previous such report, if any:
(a) A listing of the number of actions which were submitted to arbitration or other alternative methods of resolving disputes pursuant to NRS 38.250 or 38.258 and their manner of disposition;
(b) A statement of the amount of money collected in each judicial district pursuant to NRS 19.0315 and a summary of the manner in which the fees were expended; and
(c) Any recommendations for legislation or other information regarding the programs on arbitration deemed relevant by the supreme court.

30