Audit Division
Audit Summary
Risk Management
Report LA98-15
Results in Brief
The Risk Management Division lacks management controls over the
administration of the group insurance program. For instance, the Division
has not established written policies and procedures to ensure participant
information is processed timely and accurately. In addition, many of its
methods and practices contribute to delays and processing errors. As a
result, the Division has difficulty generating accurate group insurance
billings. Although significant resources are spent attempting to settle
billing discrepancies, more than $3 million remained unresolved as of April
1997. In addition, because of inaccurate group insurance information the
Division improperly transferred $600,000 to the state's group benefits
fund. Furthermore, at least $63,000 was lost because the Division paid
premiums for individuals no longer covered under the group insurance program.
The Division has significant internal control weaknesses over cash receipts.
These weaknesses include a poor process for recording money received, untimely
deposits, inadequate separation of duties, and improper use of cash receipt
forms. An effective internal control system is important because more than
$37 million in group insurance premiums was paid to the Division by check
or cash during fiscal year 1997. Without proper safeguards, fraud and abuse
could occur and go undetected.
Principal Findings
-
The Division has not established adequate regulations, policies, and procedures
over the group insurance billing process. For example, regulations do not
identify cut-off dates for sending insurance forms to RMD, and internal
procedures do not specify when information must be processed. In addition,
performance standards do not measure the timeliness and accuracy of processing
insurance information. (page 13)
-
Several practices prevent the Division from processing insurance forms
timely. These include: not allowing sufficient time to make insurance changes
before monthly bills are prepared, not processing retiree change forms
when received, and delaying the termi- nation of health benefits for deceased
individuals. (page 14)
-
The Division lacks an effective system for managing participant insurance
forms. Completed forms were kept in 11 separate locations, and forms processed
since January 1996 had not been filed. As a result, some insurance forms
are lost or misplaced. For example, we found a folder with 33 insurance
forms that had not been processed for retirees. The forms ranged in age
from several months to more than two years. One employee retired in June
1995; however, staff had not processed the form as of August 1997. (page
15)
-
The Division did not reconcile monthly billings to payments for large pay
centers. Although 31 of 44 pay center bills were reconciled as of April
1997, the monthly bills for these pay centers represented only 1% of the
total amount billed. The difference between the Division's bills and pay
centers' payments has grown rapidly and exceed $3 million. (page 16)
-
Because payments are not always reconciled with the amounts billed, data
entry errors go undetected for long periods. For example, one error for
$150,000 went uncorrected for more than two years. (page 18)
-
RMD's failure to process forms timely and reconcile payments to billings
has created additional work for the Division's Accounting and Eligibility
sections and large pay centers. Although the Division spent $2 million
on a new computer system and added five new positions in fiscal year 1996,
it is unable to process forms timely and generate accurate bills for large
pay centers. Unless RMD improves its procedures for processing insurance
forms and settling billing differences, addi- The Division lacks an effective
system for managing participant insurance forms. Completed forms were kept
in 11 separate locations, and forms processed since January 1996 had not
been filed. As a result, some insurance forms are lost or misplaced. For
example, we found a folder with 33 insurance forms that had not been processed
for retirees. The forms ranged in age from several months to more than
two years. One employee retired in June 1995; however, staff had not processed
the form as of August 1997. (page 15)
-
The Division did not reconcile monthly billings to payments for large pay
centers. Although 31 of 44 pay center bills were reconciled as of April
1997, the monthly bills for these pay centers represented only 1% of the
total amount billed. The difference between the Division's bills and pay
centers' payments has grown rapidly and exceed $3 million. (page 16)
-
Because payments are not always reconciled with the amounts billed, data
entry errors go undetected for long periods. For example, one error for
$150,000 went uncorrected for more than two years. (page 18)
-
RMD's failure to process forms timely and reconcile payments to billings
has created additional work for the Division's Accounting and Eligibility
sections and large pay centers. Although the Division spent $2 million
on a new computer system and added five new positions in fiscal year 1996,
it is unable to process forms timely and generate accurate bills for large
pay centers. Unless RMD improves its procedures for processing insurance
forms and settling billing differences, addi-tional staff and other resources
are unlikely to resolve billing problems. (page 18)
-
The Division improperly transferred more than $600,000 from the retired
employee group insurance account between January 1995 and June 1997. This
occurred because the Division's records had about 150 more retirees than
reported by PERS. Although no losses occurred, the group benefits fund
reserves are overstated by the amount of proper transfers. (page 19)
-
The state lost at least $63,000 in overpayments to one health maintenance
organization (HMO) over three years. The problem occurred because the Division
continued to pay insurance premiums for 31 individuals no longer covered.
Although the Division contended the pay centers were at fault because they
failed to provide timely notification for the terminations, we found documents
indicating a shared responsibility for the problem. (page 19)
-
The Division has significant internal control weaknesses over cash receipts.
An effective internal control system is important because the Division
received more than $37 million in checks and cash during fiscal year 1997.
These weaknesses occurred because the Division has yet to develop a comprehensive
system of internal accounting and administrative controls. (page 21)
Agency Response
to Audit Recommendations
Recommendation
Number
Accepted
Rejected
1 Establish written policies, procedures, regulations
and performance measures
for administering the
group insurance program.......................................
X
2 Ensure sufficient time to process insurance
forms by
preparing monthly bills
after the end of the month
and notifying pay centers
of billing cut-off dates.....
X
3 Process insurance change forms for retirees
and
deceased individuals when
the forms are received.
X
4 Establish a file management system ........................
X
5 Reconcile pay center payments to BISON billings
on
a monthly basis......................................................
X
6 Ensure billing discrepancies are resolved
timely........ X
7 Develop written procedures to ensure all cash
receipts are deposited and
properly recorded in
the state's accounting system.................................
X
8 Deposit cash receipts in accordance with statutory
requirements..........................................................
X
9 Separate key duties over the revenue collection
and
recording process...................................................
X
10 Comply with state requirements for the use of cash
receipt forms..........................................................
X
TOTALS
10
0