Audit Division
Audit Summary
State Emergency Response Commission
Report LA98-13
Results in Brief
Although the State Emergency Response Commission has some internal
controls, it has not established systems and procedures to ensure revenues
and expenditures are properly accounted for, assets are adequately safeguarded,
and laws, regulations, and procedures are complied with. As a result, SERC
has not fulfilled statutory requirements for collecting hazardous substance
filing fees, depositing money, and conducting employee evaluations. In
addition, some facilities submitted fees after the due date, unauthorized
expenditures were charged to SERC, and grant reporting controls were not
reviewed or evaluated to ensure they operated as intended.
Principal Findings
-
SERC has not fully met the statutory requirements for collecting the filing
fee for hazardous substance reports. First, although NRS 459.744(1) requires
fees to approximate cost, SERC has not determined how much it costs to
process the hazardous substance reports. Second, contrary to the statute,
SERC has not formally established the fee in regulation. As a result, many
facilities paid the $100 filing fee even though SERC has not fully met
the statutory requirements for collecting the fee. (page 10)
-
Facilities paid more than $228,000 months after the statutory due date.
In addition, fiscal year 1996 hazardous materials transport fees totaling
$56,000 were not transferred to SERC from the Department of Motor Vehicles
and Public Safety until after the year end. The failure to receive
hazardous materials fees by the required due date delays the granting of
these funds to LEPC's. (page 11)
-
The procedures used to collect toxic chemical release fees do not ensure
money is adequately safeguarded. As a result, payments totaling $26,000
were not deposited timely as required by law. (page 13)
-
Controls have not been developed to ensure the effective management of
accounts receivable. Reports do not indicate if payments on past due accounts
were made or if additional collection procedures were conducted. As a result,
the Commission failed to collect $1,000 from two facilities. (page 14)
-
Procedures have not been established to ensure that all expenditures are
proper. As a result, of the 15 payments we examined, 2 were for
invoices that had previously been paid, 1 did not have sufficient documentation
to determine if it was appropriate, and 1 included sales tax. (page 15)
-
The grant monitoring system has not been reviewed to determine if each
procedure is necessary to ensure accountability and compliance. In addition,
expenditure tracking reports prepared by SERC do not always agree with
those prepared by LEPC's. Unnecessary pro- cedures can result in the inefficient
use of resources and inaccurate reports diminish the value of the monitoring
system. (page 17)
-
Employee work performance evaluations have not been prepared in accordance
with laws and regulations. As a result, one employee had only two evaluations
since 1993. (page 18)
Agency Response
to Audit Recommendations
Recommendation
Number
Accepted
Rejected
1 Comply with NRS 459.744 when establishing
fees.......
X
2 Request legislation amending NRS 459.744 to
be in
agreement with Public Law
99-499 concerning
hazardous materials inventory
reporting dates.........
X
3 Consider requesting legislation amending NRS
459.744
to include penalties for
late payment of fees.............
X
4 Inform facilities that late filings will be
referred to the
U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency for
additional enforcement action...................................
X
5 Develop written procedures to ensure all fees
are
deposited timely as required
by law..........................
X
6 Develop written procedures to ensure all refunds
are
issued in compliance with
state law..........................
X
7 Develop written procedures to ensure accounts
receivable are properly
managed and collected.......
X
8 Develop written procedures to ensure all expenditures
are properly approved...............................................
X
9 Document the reconciliation of all transactions
recorded in the contingency
account for hazardous
materials...................................................................
X
10 Conduct periodic reviews to ensure grant monitoring
controls are cost effective
and operating as intended.
X
11 Develop work performance standards and prepare
annual employee evaluations
as required by law.....
X
12 Request assistance from the Office of Financial
Management, Training and
Controls to develop
and implement a complete
system of internal
controls.....................................................................
X
TOTALS
12
0