Audit Division
Audit
Summary
Department of Business and
Industry
State Dairy
Commission
LA02-13
The State Diary Commission’s
audit and investigative activities did not always comply with its standards for
monitoring the dairy industry.
Staff did not always follow audit manual guidance for planning,
supervising, and documenting audit work performed. In addition, staff investigators did not
routinely document key activities during their investigations. As a result, the Commission does not
have adequate assurance its monitoring efforts achieve the intended
purpose. Furthermore, penalties for
late payment of dairy assessments were not always collected as required. While audit and investigative functions
need strengthening, management is taking steps to better manage the Commission’s
operations.
·
Auditors
did not always document key decisions when planning audit work. Although the Commission’s policies and
procedures emphasize the importance of planning, audit staff did not document
their planning efforts in the 25 audits we reviewed. (page
7)
·
Supervisors
did not review audit work timely and adequately monitor the hours staff spent on
each audit. In 20 of 25 audits
tested, supervisors did not review audit work until after the audit was
completed and the results were reported.
In addition, audit staff understated the time they spent working on
audits by 45%. (page
7)
·
Audit
staff did not adequately document the work they performed. Although staff documented violations
they found, audit manual guidance was not always followed for documenting audit
procedures performed. For instance,
only 3 of 25 audits contained a description of the procedures performed during
the audit. (page
8)
·
Investigations
performed as part of the Commission’s regulatory activities are not adequately
documented. Investigators record
the number of investigations performed daily, but detailed information such as
establishments visited, procedures performed, and results of each investigation
are not maintained. As a result,
management lacks information to monitor investigative activities. (page
10)
·
The Commission
did not collect a late fee in 19 of 27 instances where amounts were due. Although only $700 went uncollected for
the 6 months we reviewed, regulation is inconsistent when late fees are not
enforced equally. (page
11)
· Management is taking steps to improve operations. Accomplishments include developing a strategic plan, downsizing the agency to improve efficiency, and protecting Nevada’s farms and producers from unfair pricing policies. (page 12)
Department of
Business and Industry
State Dairy Commission
Agency Response
to Audit Recommendations
Recommendation Number |
|
Accepted |
|
Rejected |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Document key audit activities such as planning
audits, performing audit work, and following up on audit
recommendations |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Review audit work timely and ensure staff
accurately report the time they spend on each
audit |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Revise policies and procedures to ensure adequate
documentation of investigative activities |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Develop policies and procedures for recording and
resolving complaints |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Establish policies and procedures to ensure late
fees are collected as required by statute |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTALS |
5 |
|
0 |