REVISED
WORK SESSION
DOCUMENT
Legislative Committee on Health Care’s
Subcommittee to Study the Development of a System for Reporting Medical
Errors
(Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 7 [File No. 77, Statutes of Nevada
2001])
April 16, 2002
The
following work session document has been prepared by staff of the Legislative
Counsel Bureau. It is designed to
assist the subcommittee members in determining which recommendations may be
forwarded to the Legislative Committee on Health Care.
The possible actions listed in
the document do not necessarily have the support or opposition of the
subcommittee. These possible actions
simply are compiled and organized so the members may review them to decide if
they should be adopted, changed, rejected, or further considered. Sponsors of recommendations may be noted in
parentheses.
In addition, Assembly Concurrent
Resolution No. 7 [File No. 77, Statutes of Nevada 2001] specifies that
no action may be taken by the subcommittee on recommended legislation unless it
is approved by a majority of the members of the Senate and a majority of the
members of the Assembly appointed to the subcommittee.
GENERAL
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STATEMENTS
1.
Send a letter from the Legislative Committee on
Health Care to the medical professional associations and organizations in
this state urging them to create a Nevada Alliance for Patient Safety (NAPS). The NAPS would strive to achieve consensus
on recommendations to promote systemic change within medical facilities to
improve patient safety by discussing patient safety issues, encouraging sharing
of best practices, creating documents and issuing press releases to the public
on good patient behavior and for professionals on best practices. Membership of the NAPS would include all professional
associations and organizations and advocacy groups that are willing to
participate, with relevant state agencies invited to serve as advisory
members. The NAPS would provide an
annual report to the Legislative Committee on Health Care. See Exhibit A. (Recommended by Chairman John Yacenda.)
2.
Send a letter from the Legislative Committee on
Health Care to the Nevada Hospital Association urging the association to
publicize to consumers and health care advocacy organizations information about
the coordinated efforts of its members to promote patient safety and to create
centers of excellence for best practices in order to share knowledge and
experience as it relates to the prevention of medical errors and adverse events
and the promotion of patient safety.
(Recommended by Chairman John Yacenda.)
3.
Send a letter from the Legislative Committee on
Health Care to each licensed medical facility urging the facility to
provide to each patient a statement referencing its mission to ensure a safe
patient environment and to ensure that the rights of patients are recognized
and respected. The telephone numbers
for the facility’s safety director; the Bureau of Licensure and Certification,
Health Division, Nevada’s Department of Human Resources; and the Joint Commission
on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations should also be provided to assist
a patient who may have a question and to assist if an issue arises that the
patient believes should be reported.
(Recommended by Assemblywoman Bonnie L. Parnell; Bill Welch,
Nevada Hospital Association, 4/5/02 correspondence.)
4.
Send a letter from the Legislative Committee on
Health Care to each licensed medical facility urging the facility to
include in its admission package: (1)
the telephone number and address for the Office for Consumer Health Assistance
in the Office of the Governor and the Bureau of Hospital Patient Safety within
the Office for Consumer Health Assistance; (2) information to assist a patient
who may have a question and to assist if an issue arises that the patient
believes should be reported; and (3) a copy of the Patient’s Rights provisions
set forth in Nevada Revised Statutes.
(Recommended by Assemblywoman Bonnie L. Parnell.)
5.
Send a letter from the Legislative Committee on
Health Care to all health profession licensing and oversight boards urging
them to meet and coordinate their efforts to ensure and encourage patient
safety by agreeing, to the extent authorized by law, to standardize their
practices and policies for:
(1) informing the public of professional licensees and how this
information is provided to consumers; (2) accepting and investigating
complaints from the public or other health care providers or institutions; (3)
disclosing their findings to the public; and (4) disclosing the names of
patients and professionals involved in the complaints and investigations. In the letter to the licensing boards, urge
them to coordinate their policies relating to consumer and professional
education through public service announcements, mailers, or partnering with
appropriate agencies. Also, express in
this letter that the licensing boards should propose and support changes to the
Nevada Revised Statutes that would accommodate the standardization of
their practices and policies.
(Recommended by Chairman John Yacenda.)
6.
Send a letter to the Legislative Committee on Health
Care requesting the committee to not propose any changes to the state’s
current methods of reporting potential violations of the state regulations and
statutes that govern the practice of individual health care providers. See Exhibit B. (Recommended by the State Board of Nursing,
3/29/02 correspondence.)
7.
Send a letter to the Legislative Committee on Health
Care listing the legal implications and protections that should be
considered in any action taken by the committee concerning the reporting of
adverse events attributable to errors in the practice of medicine, dentistry,
nursing, pharmacy, and care received at medical facilities, and urging the
committee to consider these implications and protections. These implications and protections include,
without limitation, qualified immunity, whistleblower protections, and
confidentiality. (Recommended by
Chairman John Yacenda.)
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STATEMENTS
RELATED TO STATE AGENCY PROGRAMS
8.
Send a letter from the Legislative Committee on
Health Care to Nevada’s Department of Human Resources (DHR) urging the
department to require, to the extent authorized by law, medical facilities that
are not accredited by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations to maintain a confidential file of certain sentinel events. This file would only be available to the
licensure survey personnel of the Bureau of Licensure and Certification, Health
Division, DHR, at the time of on-site surveys.
(Recommended by Assemblywoman Bonnie L. Parnell; Robin Keith,
Nevada Rural Hospital Project, 3/24/02 correspondence.)
9.
Send a letter from the Legislative Committee on
Health Care to Nevada’s Department of Administration, Nevada’s Department
of Human Resources (DHR), and the chairmen and members of the Legislature’s
Senate Committee on Finance and the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means,
urging support for funding vacant positions in the Bureau of Licensure and
Certification, Health Division, DHR.
Also, send a letter urging the DHR and the Department of Personnel to
review the position of a Health Facilities Surveyor and upgrade the
requirements for all positions in this series to ensure expertise in the areas
being surveyed. (Recommended by
Assemblywoman Bonnie L. Parnell; Robin Keith, Nevada Rural Hospital
Project, 3/24/02 correspondence; Bill Welch, Nevada Hospital Association,
4/5/02 correspondence; Mark VanderLinden, 3/27/02 correspondence.)
10.
Send a letter from the Legislative Committee on
Health Care to the Health Division of Nevada’s Department of Human
Resources urging the division to require, to the extent authorized by law,
hospitals to report medical errors, adverse events, preventable adverse events,
adverse outcomes that are related to nurse staffing levels, and
nurse-to-patient ratios. Also, urge the
division to include, to the extent authorized by law, through progressive
monetary penalties not to exceed $10,000, suspension or revocation of licensure
and/or public disclosure of penalties for acute care facilities that fail to
report medical errors, adverse events, preventable adverse events, adverse
outcomes that are related to nurse staffing levels, and staffing levels. [MPT1](Recommended
by Maryanne Dawicki, Service Employees International Union, 3/29/02
correspondence.)
11.
Send a letter from the Legislative Committee on
Health Care to Nevada’s Department of Human Resources (DHR) urging the
department to include in its proposed budget to the Office of the Governor
funding to enhance the current database of the Bureau of Licensure and
Certification, Health Division, DHR.
The bureau would implement an Internet-based information system to
permit health care providers access to information obtained by the bureau. (Recommended by Mark VanderLinden,
3/27/02 correspondence.)
12.
Send a letter from the Legislative Committee on
Health Care to Nevada’s Department of Human Resources (DHR) urging the
department to require the Bureau of Licensure and Certification, Health
Division, DHR, to annually review all regulations related to quality
improvement and patient safety in health care facilities. Also, request the department to sanction
facilities that do not comply with such regulations and do not address the
issue within the required time frame.
(Recommended by Assemblywoman Bonnie L. Parnell; Robin Keith,
Nevada Rural Hospital Project, 3/24/02 correspondence.)
13. Send
a letter from the Legislative Committee on Health Care to the Health
Division of Nevada’s Department of Human Resources urging the division to
consolidate the efforts of its Bureau of Licensure and Certification and Bureau
of Health Planning and Statistics to generate a consolidated report detailing
all deaths and adverse outcomes attributable to errors in the practice of
medicine, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy, and care received at medical
facilities. The report would be
submitted to the Nevada Alliance for Patient Safety, if such an alliance were
created as urged in the first recommendation, for review, analysis,
abstraction, and dissemination of findings.
(Recommended by Chairman John Yacenda.)
14. Send
a letter from the Legislative Committee on Health Care to the Division of
Health Care Financing and Policy of Nevada’s Department of Human Resources,
requesting the division to submit quarterly reports to the Nevada Alliance for
Patient Safety (of which Nevada Medicaid would be an advisory member), if such
an alliance is created as urged in the first recommendation, of the division’s
response and follow-up to the Drug Utilization Review Board’s actions
identifying beneficiaries of assistance provided by or administered by the
division who are potentially at risk for drug therapy problems, and the manner
in which the division is ensuring that actions are being taken to prevent drug
therapy problems among these beneficiaries.
(Recommended by Chairman John Yacenda.)
15. Send
a letter from the Legislative Committee on Health Care to Nevada’s
Department of Human Resources (DHR) and the chairmen and members of the
Legislature’s Senate Committee on Finance and the Assembly Committee on Ways
and Means urging support for funding $3 million over the 2003-2005
biennium to the Bureau of Licensure and Certification, Health Division, DHR, to
conduct on-site annual reviews of all medical facilities to ensure that the
requirements contained in the Nevada Administrative Code relating to
quality of care and patient safety are being satisfied. (Recommended by Bill Welch, Nevada
Hospital Association, 4/5/02 correspondence.)
16. Send
a letter from the Legislative Committee on Health Care to the Insurance
Commissioner of the Division of Insurance, Nevada’s Department of Business and
Industry, urging the commissioner, to the extent authorized by law, to consider
mandated discounts for professional liability insurance premiums when
hospitals, physicians, and others participate in a state-sponsored health
collaborative. (Recommended by
Mark VanderLinden, 3/27/02 correspondence.)
17. Send
a letter from the Legislative Committee on Health Care urging Nevada’s
Department of Human Resources (DHR) to adopt the reporting and investigating
mechanism for adverse events of the Division of Mental Health and Developmental
Services, DHR, as a model for all publicly funded programs of medical, dental,
and psychological care administered by the department. (Recommended by Chairman John Yacenda.)
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LEGISLATIVE MEASURES
18.
Request the drafting of a bill appropriating
$100,000 to fund the development and maintenance of a statewide medical adverse
event surveillance system. This system
should be developed by a private agency with expertise in patient safety and
health care data analysis using existing vital statistics and electronic
hospital discharge data supplemented with targeted review of medical
records. (Recommended by Michael P.
Silver, HealthInsight, 3/27/02 correspondence.)
19.
Request the drafting of a bill requiring
professional licensing boards to keep reports of medical errors
confidential. This measure would allow
the boards to release information to the public only after a potential
violation is confirmed and disciplinary action is taken against a
licensee. (Recommended by Bill Welch,
Nevada Hospital Association, 4/5/02 correspondence.)
20. Request
the drafting of a bill appropriating $11 million for the first year and $5
million for the next year to fund the University and Community College System
of Nevada programs for licensed health care professionals with an emphasis on
nursing. (Recommended by Assemblywoman
Bonnie L. Parnell; Bill Welch, Nevada Hospital Association, 4/5/02
correspondence; Robin Keith, Nevada Rural Hospital Project, 3/24/02
correspondence.)
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LEGISLATIVE MEASURE CONCERNING
REPORTING SYSTEMS FOR REPORTING MEDICAL ERRORS
Mandatory Medical Error
Reporting Systems
21.
Request the drafting of a bill establishing a
mandatory medical error reporting system requiring preventable medical errors,
adverse events, adverse outcomes that are related to nurse staffing levels, and
nurse-to-patient ratios to be reported by hospitals to the Bureau of Licensure
and Certification, Health Division, Nevada’s Department of Human
Resources. Provide that the reporting
system includes nurse staffing information and public access to all mandatory
reports. Under this system, the
directors of risk management and/or quality improvement of hospitals would be
required to submit the information to the Bureau of Licensure and
Certification. See Exhibit C. (Recommended by Maryanne Dawicki, Service
Employees International Union, 3/29/02 correspondence.)
22.
Request the drafting of a bill establishing a
mandatory medical error reporting system that includes the following elements:
(a)
An anonymous and confidential reporting system, which
would protect the identity of the patient and health care practitioner;
(b)
Coordination by the Division of Health of Nevada’s
Department of Human Resources (DHR) to act as a data repository and facilitate
information flow, communication, and task allocation among regulatory bodies;
(c)
Aggregation of facility performance data with
disclosure of aggregated data through annual and accessible public reports;
(d)
Performance of a thorough follow-up and analysis of
internal facility processes utilized to identify and improve medical error and
quality-of-care issues by the Bureau of Licensure and Certification, Health
Division, DHR;
(e)
Protection of information in the report from subpoena
or discovery process in legal actions; and
(f)
Limitation of $50,000 in recoverable damages in medical
malpractice actions in which errors have been reported in good faith.
(Recommended by Nina Carter, Health
Research/Product Manager, HealthMarketInsights, 4/1/02 correspondence.)
23.
Request the drafting of a bill specifically
authorizing each county whose population is 400,000 or more to establish and
maintain a medical error reporting system.
See
Exhibit D. (Recommended by Donald S.
Kwalick, M.D., Clark County Health District, 3/29/02 correspondence.)
Voluntary
Medical Error Reporting Systems
24.
Request the drafting of a bill establishing a
voluntary medical error reporting system that would include information
concerning adverse events to analyze current trends and enhance or improve best
practices. This system would require
data from medical facilities to be reported to a central repository. A state agency or a private agency under
contract with the state would manage the repository. Information submitted to the repository would remain
confidential. Require protection from
legal discovery of the data in the system.
(Discussed at the February 2002 meeting during the interim; recommended
by subcommittee members.)
25.
Request the drafting of a bill establishing a
voluntary medical error reporting system that would include information
concerning adverse events and near misses to identify hazardous conditions,
practices, and linkages in health care.
This system would include secure Web-based capability with its design
adapted from the Aviation Safety Reporting System maintained and run by the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Require this system to be integrated with existing and national
reporting systems and also have the ability to support analysis of conditions
of concern locally. Any information
reported to this system must remain confidential and protected from legal
discovery. See Exhibit E. (Recommended by Michael P. Silver,
HealthInsight, 3/27/02 correspondence.)
26.
Request the drafting of a bill appropriating
$300,000 to ensure credible and thorough analysis of data of voluntary reports
received by a private agency with expertise in patient safety and health care
data analysis, effective feedback to the reporting community, and timely
dissemination of information to health care providers. Funding considerations should include the
development and maintenance of analysis, feedback, and dissemination of
information received through the voluntary reporting system. (Recommended by Michael P. Silver,
HealthInsight, 3/27/02 correspondence).
27.
Request the drafting of a bill establishing a
voluntary, anonymous, and confidential medical error reporting system. Require protection of reported information
from subpoena or discovery process in legal actions. A centralized data system established and run by a private,
independent organization would collect the reported information. The organization would issue reports
quarterly to the public. See Exhibit F. (Recommended by Beatrice Razor, 3/7/02
correspondence.)
28.
Request the drafting of a bill establishing
within the Bureau of Licensure and Certification, Health Division, Nevada’s
Department of Human Resources, a complimentary, voluntary reporting program
providing confidentiality and protection to participating caregivers and
hospitals if a mandatory medical error reporting system is established as set
forth in Recommendation 21. Information
collected through this system would not be publicly available. Hospitals would be required to share this
information to prevent medical errors and adverse outcomes. (Recommended by Maryanne Dawicki, Service
Employees International Union, 3/29/02, correspondence.)
29. Request
the drafting of a bill requiring Nevada’s Department of Human Resources
(DHR) to establish an Internet-based registry for an anonymous, voluntary,
password-protected, standardized incident reporting system and registry. Hospitals, long-term care facilities,
ambulatory surgery centers, and other related facilities would be authorized to
input confidential information into the registry. The system would track adverse events attributable to errors in
the practice of medicine, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy, and medical
facilities. Participation in the registry
would be voluntary. The system would be
operated by a private agency under contract with the DHR. The establishment of the reporting system
would be dependent on state funding or grants, gifts, endowments, bequests, or
direct appropriation for its creation.
See Exhibit G. (Recommended by
Chairman John Yacenda.)
Other
30.
Send a letter to the Legislative Committee on Health
Care recommending to the committee that the State of Nevada not develop a
mandatory reporting system for medical errors, adverse events, or sentinel
events. (Recommended by Michael P.
Silver, HealthInsight, 3/27/02 correspondence.)
31.
Send a letter to the Legislative Committee on Health
Care recommending to the committee that the State of Nevada not develop an
external medical error reporting system until internal reporting systems in
health care facilities are identified and remediated. (Recommended by Lisa Black, Nevada Nurses Association,
4/4/02 correspondence.)
32.
Request the drafting of a resolution providing
for an interim study to continue identifying and reviewing internal reporting
systems in health care facilities. The
study might consider system failures to determine whether they contribute to
medical errors. The study may also
examine the changes that are necessary in an internal reporting system to
effectively implement an external reporting system. (Recommended by Lisa Black, Nevada Nurses Association,
4/4/02 correspondence.)
[MPT1]What type of incidents?